Validation of the AGILIS ambulatory blood pressure monitor according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol for validation of blood pressure measuring devices in adults.
نویسندگان
چکیده
BACKGROUND We evaluated the clinical validity of the AGILIS ambulatory blood pressure monitor according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol. METHODS The blood pressure (BP) was measured at the same arm by two certified observers using two mercury columns and a double stethoscope, then by the volunteer with the automatic device, these measurements were done seven times sequentially using 33 volunteers. For the randomization of the patient, one ABPM measure was compared to the mean of three manual measures. Then, we had three ABPM measures and four manual measures. Each ABPM measure, being compared to two manual measures. Blood pressure readings and recordings were blinded. Position of the subjects was standardized. RESULTS Phase 1: To pass phase 1, the device had to have at least 25 of the 45 measurements within 5 mmHg, 35 within 10 mmHg or 40 within 15 mmHg of the comparative observer measurements. The AGILIS monitor had 35 measurements lying within 5 mmHg, 42 within 10 mmHg and 45 within 15 mmHg for systolic BP (SBP), 35 within 5 mmHg, 44 within 10 mmHg and 45 within 15 mmHg for diastolic BP (DBP). It passed the criteria for SBP and DBP. Phase 2: To pass phase 2.1, a device must have at least 60 of 99 measurements within 5 mmHg, 75 within 10 mmHg and 90 within 15 mmHg of the comparative observer measurements, and in addition must also have either 65 within 5 mmHg and 80 within 10 mmHg, or 65 within 5 mmHg and 95 within 15 mmHg, or 80 within 10 mmHg and 95 within 15 mmHg. The AGILIS monitor had 78 measurements within 5 mmHg, 91 within 10 mmHg and 96 within 15 mmHg for SBP; and 70 measurements within 5 mmHg, 92 within 10 mmHg and 96 within 15 mmHg for DBP. It passed the criteria for SBP and DBP. For phase 2.2 using the AGILIS monitor, 27 subjects had at least two of the differences within 5 mmHg and none had any differences within 5 mmHg for SBP; 27 subjects had at least two of the differences within 5 mmHg and three subjects had no differences within 5 mmHg for DBP. The results are in concordance with the requested criteria for phase 2.2. CONCLUSION Thus the AGILIS device fulfils the validation criteria of the international protocol.
منابع مشابه
Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring of the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol for validation of blood pressure measuring devices in adults.
Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring of the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol for validation of blood pressure measuring devices in adults Eoin O’Brien,Thomas Pickering, Roland Asmar, Martin Myers, Gianfranco Parati, Jan Staessen, Thomas Mengden, Yutaka Imai, Bernard Waeber and Paolo Palatini and with the statistical assistance of Neil Atkins and William Gerin, on be...
متن کاملValidation of the ROSSMAX blood pressure measuring monitor according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol for Validation of Blood Pressure Measuring Devices in Adults.
BACKGROUND It is now accepted that blood pressure measuring devices should be subjected to an independent evaluation of their accuracy before they are marketed for clinical use. The results of validation of the ROSSMAX Blood Pressure Measuring Monitor for self-measurement according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol for Validation of Blood Pressure Measuring Devices ...
متن کاملValidation requirements for ambulatory blood pressure measuring systems.
The increasing application of ambulatory blood pressure measurement in clinical practice has stimulated the manufacture of a large number of ambulatory systems which must be independently validated. The British Hypertension Society protocol for the evaluation of blood pressure measuring devices has now been used to evaluate eight ambulatory systems. Based on this experience recommendations are ...
متن کاملThe need for a standardized protocol for validating non-invasive ambulatory blood pressure measuring devices.
Increasing interest in ambulatory blood pressure measurement has resulted in the proliferation of non-invasive measurement systems. This paper discusses the problems associated with validation of these systems. There is an urgent requirement for a standardized protocol for validation of ambulatory systems which is practicable, universally applicable and which is acceptable to investigators, pub...
متن کاملValidation of the Microlife WatchBP O3 device for clinic, home, and ambulatory blood pressure measurement, according to the International Protocol.
To determine the accuracy of the Microlife WatchBP O3 blood pressure measuring device tested according to the requirements of the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension. The WatchBP O3 is designed to provide clinic, ambulatory, and self blood pressure (BP) measurements. Device evaluation was performed in 33 participants with a mean +/- standard deviation age of 56.1+/-20...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Blood pressure monitoring
دوره 8 6 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2003